Nolan Arenado may have gained the Nationwide League Most Priceless Participant award final yr, although he misplaced out to teammate Paul Goldschmidt, who gave chase to the Triple Crown and completed with the extra eye-catching conventional stats (however barely decrease fWAR and bWAR). However whereas Goldschmidt has been equally productive this yr amid the Cardinals’ dreadful begin — certainly, his three homers on Sunday helped finish the workforce’s eight-game shedding streak — the identical can’t be stated for Arenado, who’s off to an uncharacteristically dangerous begin.
Between compiling their worst document by 35 video games in half a century and making the puzzling resolution to maneuver marquee free agent Willson Contreras off of catcher, the Cardinals are such a multitude that I discussed Arenado solely in passing on Monday. He’s nowhere close to the workforce’s largest drawback, but on the similar time, the 32-year-old third baseman is hitting simply .232/.282/.326 for a 69 wRC+ so far. His 82-point drop from final yr’s 151 wRC+ is the majors’ second-largest amongst gamers with not less than 400 plate appearances final yr and 100 this yr:
Largest wRC+ Drop-Offs from 2022 to ’23
Title
Workforce
AVG
OBP
SLG
wRC+
AVG 23
OBP 23
SLG 23
wRC+ 23
Dif
José Abreu
2Tm
.304
.378
.446
137
.225
.272
.268
50
-87
Nolan Arenado
STL
.293
.358
.533
151
.232
.282
.326
69
-82
Aaron Choose
NYY
.311
.425
.686
207
.261
.352
.511
134
-73
George Springer
TOR
.267
.342
.472
132
.210
.273
.304
63
-69
Starling Marte
NYM
.292
.347
.468
136
.213
.292
.278
68
-68
Andrés Giménez
CLE
.297
.371
.466
140
.220
.294
.325
73
-67
Josh Naylor
CLE
.256
.319
.452
117
.198
.252
.315
52
-65
Carlos Correa
MIN
.291
.366
.467
140
.193
.271
.378
79
-61
Manny Machado
SDP
.298
.366
.531
152
.252
.303
.389
93
-59
Julio Rodríguez
SEA
.284
.345
.509
146
.210
.278
.399
91
-55
Jose Miranda
MIN
.268
.325
.426
117
.219
.275
.313
65
-52
Amed Rosario
CLE
.283
.312
.403
103
.217
.262
.300
53
-50
Elvis Andrus
2Tm
.249
.303
.404
105
.208
.291
.264
57
-48
Jurickson Profar
2Tm
.243
.331
.391
110
.210
.304
.328
62
-48
Andrew Benintendi
3Tm
.304
.373
.399
122
.270
.324
.325
77
-45
Minimal 400 plate appearances in 2022 and 100 plate appearances in ’23.
Arenado, whose 207-point drop in slugging can also be the majors’ largest at these cutoffs, isn’t the one MVP-caliber participant struggling. Choose, the reigning AL MVP, hasn’t come near replicating final yr’s astronomical numbers, although he’s nonetheless an above-average hitter. Machado, who completed between Goldschmidt and Arenado within the NL MVP voting (and edged each in WAR), is scuffling almost as badly as his fellow third baseman. A number of latest All-Stars in addition to these gamers (Benintendi, Giménez, Marte, Rodríguez, and Springer) are represented above as nicely. That’s baseball, Suzyn.
To have a look at Arenado’s stats is to play “What’s Unsuitable with This Image?” as a result of a complete lot of his numbers are out of whack relative to final yr and his longer monitor document. The overarching theme that emerges upon nearer inspection is that he’s shedding the battle to regulate the strike zone, and his contact is the poorer for it. Swing charges begin stabilize to at 50 PA, so it’s noteworthy that he’s providing at 51.9% of all pitches, his highest fee since his 2013 rookie season, and up from 48.4% final yr. Likewise in relation to his 40.2% chase fee, up from 36.1% final yr. His 11.4% swinging-strike fee is his highest ever, up almost three factors from final yr’s 8.6%, and two factors above his norm.
All of that matches into the sample of a participant who’s urgent. That wouldn’t be stunning underneath the circumstances, which on this case embrace a reigning division champion that even amid a two-game profitable streak — the second of which Arenado sat out on Monday night time — owns the NL’s worst document at 12–24.
Pitch-wise, Arenado’s whiff charges are notably elevated in opposition to four-seam fastballs (20.7%, up from final yr’s 13.3%), changeups (34.6%, up from 23.2%), sliders (33.8%, up from 25.6%), and curves (26.3%, up rom 20.6%), which collectively account for about 72% of the pitches he’s seen. Total, his 20.8% strikeout fee is the very best of his profession, six proportion factors above his profession fee and almost double final yr’s 11.6% fee. In the meantime, his 6.7% stroll fee is his lowest mark since 2015, and down 1.7 factors from final yr.
So, he’s making contact much less, and when he does, it’s not nice. Arenado is hitting the ball on the bottom greater than ever, and his common exit velocity, barrel fee and hard-hit charges are the bottom of his profession:
Nolan Arenado Batted Ball Stats
Season
BBE
GB/FB
GB%
FB%
EV
Barrel%
HardHit%
2019
503
0.80
36.0%
44.7%
89.4
6.8%
37.6%
2020
166
0.79
37.3%
47.0%
87.8
5.4%
33.7%
2021
504
0.63
31.3%
49.8%
89.0
6.7%
37.1%
2022
489
0.59
29.7%
49.9%
88.7
8.2%
38.9%
2023
108
1.24
43.5%
35.2%
86.9
3.7%
33.3%
I’ve solely gone again so far as 2019, however the knowledge covers some peaks and valleys, beginning with that 41-homer season, then a tough and sad 2020 that was marred by his taking part in although an AC joint harm. His 2021 was a partial rebound, with 34 homers however only a .312 on-base proportion and 113 wRC+, down 18 factors from his 2017–19 run. Then got here final yr’s stellar marketing campaign, by which he hit .293/.358/.533 and set profession bests with a 150 wRC+ and seven.3 WAR.
The one different time in addition to this season by which Arenado has ever had a groundball fee above 40% was in his 2013 rookie season; taking part in half his video games in Coors Discipline, he rapidly realized the benefit to getting the ball off the bottom and into the skinny air. He’s had just one different season with a groundball-flyball ratio above 1.0, and that was in 2018 (1.03, with a 39.9% groundball fee).
Via the years, Arenado’s Statcast numbers have usually been fairly middling. Except for final yr’s barrel fee, which positioned within the 53rd percentile, he hasn’t had an exit velo, barrel fee, or hard-hit fee within the fiftieth percentile or above since 2019. Even in the very best of occasions, he makes quite a lot of dangerous contact — balls that Statcast classifies as weak, topped, or underneath however which are considerably elusive of their actual parameters. By way of the Baseball Savant Pitch Highlighter hyperlink (underneath Visuals from the principle Baseball Savant menu — I share this as a result of I can’t discover it with out breadcrumbs), you may get a really feel for them by way of these fancy interactive radial graphs, the place rollovers illustrate every sort of contact and the way the hitter has carried out inside that class. For instance, listed here are screenshots for his topped balls — these with low exit velocity and largely unfavourable launch angles — for 2022 and ’23:
In the event you squint on the stat strains close to the underside, you’ll be able to see that he’s hitting extra of these as a proportion of his batted balls, and that his batting common on them has fallen by almost half. Certainly, balls within the weak, topped, and underneath buckets hardly ever go for hits. Final yr, these accounted for 60.4% of Arenado’s batted ball occasions, on which he hit .103 and slugged .155; for 2015–22, they make up 60.8% of his batted balls, with a .136 AVG and .194 SLG. This yr, they make up 64.8%, his highest fee save for his dismal 2020 (71.1%), and on these, he’s hitting and slugging simply .087; he’s really a bit unfortunate on these, given his .124 xBA and .155 xSLG. That’s contributing to him falling in need of his total anticipated numbers for the primary time within the Statcast period:
Nolan Arenado Statcast Anticipated Stats
Season
BBE
AVG
xBA
Dif
SLG
xSLG
Dif
wOBA
xwOBA
Dif
2019
503
.315
.270
+.045
.583
.480
+.103
.392
.343
+.049
2020
166
.253
.235
+.018
.434
.392
+.042
.308
.288
+.020
2021
504
.255
.248
+.007
.494
.420
+.074
.336
.311
+.025
2022
489
.293
.266
+.027
.533
.445
+.088
.381
.339
+.042
2023
108
.232
.244
-.012
.326
.354
-.028
.268
.285
-.017
I’ve solely proven the the previous 4 seasons plus this one right here, however the development goes again to 2015. I don’t know if that’s a Coors Discipline factor or if Arenado has lived a charmed life, however each single yr, he outdid his xBA, xSLG, and xwOBA, a development that continued to St. Louis. 5 occasions in eight seasons, his slugging proportion was not less than 81 factors larger than anticipated. This yr, for the primary time, he’s lagging behind his anticipated stats, and so his 91-point year-to-year drop in xSLG turns into the aforementioned 207-point drop in precise slugging proportion.
Even with that in thoughts, Arenado is struggling as badly as he ever has by way of energy. Right here’s his rolling xSLG over 75 PA:
Arenado has taken a few of the blame for the workforce’s sluggish begin and vaguely acknowledged points together with his swing. By way of the St. Louis Put up-Dispatch’s Lynn Worthy:
Arenado’s timing has been out of whack on the plate, and he has been attempting to kind by points together with his swing and described himself as “a bit disconnected” mechanically.
“It’s unlucky,” Arenado stated. “I feel if we have been profitable, I most likely wouldn’t be fearful about it a lot. However the truth that we’re shedding, it feels lots worse as a result of I’m not taking part in my half. That comes with the territory, I suppose. I anticipate to repair it. I’m working laborious on it, and hopefully immediately is an efficient day.”
On the timing notice, the slugger’s efficiency in opposition to four-seam fastballs notably stands out and likewise factors again to the SLG-xSLG hole:
Nolan Arenado vs 4-Seam Fastballs
All 4-Seam
%
PA
AVG
xBA
SLG
xSLG
wOBA
xwOBA
Whiff%
2019
37.2%
213
.309
.247
.574
.459
.388
.327
16.3%
2020
38.4%
81
.303
.259
.553
.449
.370
.315
9.7%
2021
32.1%
201
.223
.229
.457
.429
.304
.303
14.0%
2022
28.7%
170
.311
.243
.583
.431
.412
.333
13.3%
2023
26.9%
39
.176
.224
.382
.400
.277
.304
20.7%
2019
13.9%
93
.269
.230
.355
.405
.362
.313
13.8%
2020
14.00%
26
.320
.306
.346
.536
.396
.369
16.7%
2021
10.9%
72
.297
.279
.347
.430
.377
.337
16.5%
2022
10.7%
69
.350
.255
.420
.401
.404
.335
19.6%
2023
9.1%
11
.182
.213
.182
.426
.299
.268
14.7%
SOURCE: Baseball Savant
Arenado’s slugging proportion in opposition to all four-seamers has fallen off by 201 factors relative to final yr, but his xSLG in opposition to them is down solely 31 factors. His normal performances in opposition to the pitch have different, typically out of step with the remainder of his strains (notice the sturdy 2020 in an in any other case weak yr, adopted by a drop-off in what was in any other case a a lot stronger marketing campaign). A peek at his performances in opposition to heaters 95 mph or larger reveals extra constant work from 2019 to ’22, with a drop this season that will simply owe to pattern measurement. He’s really whiffing much less in opposition to these pitches, and his xSLG on them is definitely larger, all of which brings to thoughts Ben Clemens’ Abreu-flavored investigation into year-to-year correlations (or the dearth of them) after we get this granular. Brief model: whiff charges on four-seamers of 95 mph or extra correlate fairly nicely from yr to yr, however run values — which summarize the standard of contact in addition to the swings-and-misses — don’t.
All of which is to say that I don’t suppose that is the start of the tip for Arenado. He’s in a nasty stoop that will owe one thing to the self-induced strain of not producing as his workforce hits the skids, however that’s to not counsel he gained’t get out of it. I’ll exit on a limb and counsel that fixing his swing remains to be most likely simpler to do than remaking a lackluster rotation that’s scapegoating the brand new catcher.