It was the Earlier than Instances, November 21, 2019 to be precise. Whereas dinosaurs not roamed the earth, we had but to study COVID-19. Unencumbered, a number of FanGraphs staffers descended upon Manhattan for a FanGraphs Stay occasion and an Successfully Wild taping. Yours really was on the Main League Replace panel alongside The Athletic’s Lindsey Adler and Marc Carig. Close to the tip of our half-hour section, EW co-host Meg Rowley requested us, “What would you modify about baseball?… What would you do at this second, at this juncture, to make baseball extra compelling?”
I don’t even recall the reply I supposed to provide, however after ready my flip, I constructed upon one in all Marc’s concepts about his need to see the ball put in play extra usually. “Begin caring about batting common once more,” I mentioned. “As a result of batting common is enjoyable.”
An precise take heed to the podcast suggests in any other case, however in my very own recollection, it felt like a kind of record-scratch moments the place the whole lot stops abruptly and you’ll hear a pin drop. A FanGraphs author, one with a prolonged observe document of making use of sabermetric ideas, one who made his title with objectivity-based Corridor of Fame evaluation — that man, defending batting common?
My impulse to defend this most simple determine — the one which for thus many people served as a gateway drug to caring about batting stats — had arisen late within the 2019 season whereas watching debate over the AL MVP award unfold. Coming off a weak yr with the Rockies, DJ LeMahieu had signed with the Yankees and put collectively what stands out as his greatest full season, hitting .327/.375/.518 whereas setting profession highs in residence runs (26), wRC+ (136), and WAR (5.7). LeMahieu ranked ninth within the AL in that final class, considerably behind league chief Alex Bregman (8.3) and MVP winner Mike Trout (7.8, regardless of lacking most of September because of season-ending surgical procedure to alleviate a Morton’s neuroma). However LeMahieu’s one-man hit parade had been one of many season’s greatest and most nice surprises. He’d received the hearts of followers within the Bronx, and down the stretch was greeted with chants of “M-V-P!” in his honor.
Someplace between my very own dismissal of the notion that LeMahieu deserved critical MVP consideration and the announcement that he was not a finalist for the award, which was thought of a snub in some quarters, I got here round. Therefore my try and articulate my concern to the FanGraphs Stay viewers, significantly when the idea linked to Marc’s feedback about how static the sport had change into.
“I’m not saying DJ LeMahieu ought to have [been] MVP, however there’s a purpose individuals care about DJ LeMahieu… [Y]ou’re hitting .330. You’re placing the ball in play… guys are operating round on the sphere, not hanging out. There’s enjoyable there,” I defined, working up a head of steam. “Let’s cease speaking about caring about batting common as being this scourge… It’s a connection to informal fandom, it’s a connection to the sport’s historical past. It’s one thing that I feel, from the analytics facet, we’ve gone too far overboard in working in opposition to… Let’s give a shit about batting common once more.”
I wiped away beads of flopsweat as I waited for my phrases to land. “What about wins and losses? No? Nonetheless silly?” requested Marc as the entire room erupted with laughter. “It’s FanGraphs, we now have to attract the road someplace,” giggled Meg earlier than directing the viewers right into a Q&A session.
Looking back, I can hint a few of my restored appreciation for the stat to having labored on The Cooperstown Casebook. Throughout the guide, I’d famous that the Corridor of Famers with the bottom JAWS rankings at every place have been very often these with shiny batting averages from the high-offense Twenties and ’30s whose elections had been aided by the cronyism of the Frankie Frisch/Invoice Terry Veterans Committees. In writing about these gamers, my stance had softened from a reflexive urge to throw the bums out (per the guide’s cheeky subtitle) to a extra understanding rationalization of how they’d snuck in. What’s extra, I’d taken a minimum of some satisfaction in debunking the way in which that sure high-average gamers beforehand derided because the establishment’s most overrated, reminiscent of George Sisler, Hughie Jennings, and Joe Kelley, match extra easily inside a continuum of Corridor of Famers within the mild of WAR and JAWS.
Statheads who know their historical past know that batting common has been beneath assault since earlier than Invoice James’ emergence. Baseball Journal’s F.C. Lane railed in opposition to it in 1915 and proposed slugging proportion as a greater measure. Department Rickey, along with perfecting the farm system and flattening the AL/NL shade barrier, roughly invented on-base proportion in 1954. From these proto-sabermetricians to James (who launched Run Created in his Baseball Summary sequence within the Seventies and ’80s) and the dynamic duo of Pete Palmer and John Thorn (who in 1984’s The Hidden Recreation of Baseball gave us OPS and Linear Weights), and onto Baseball Prospectus, Tom Tango, and the writers at FanGraphs, good individuals have proven again and again that batting common isn’t the perfect stat for measuring offense. It doesn’t correlate as properly with run scoring as OBP, SLG, or extra superior metrics. Properly, so what? For many years now, we’ve integrated the data of these stats’ significance into our measures of offensive proficiency by way of OPS+, wOBA, wRC+, and WAR. With out having to crunch these numbers ourselves, we will deploy them when wanted, construct leaderboards, undertaking performances, estimate contract values, fill out extra enlightened Corridor of Fame ballots. Huzzah!
But I’m satisfied that we’ve ignored batting common at our peril. Since time is a flat circle, half a decade after that FanGraphs Stay episode, I discovered myself assuming an identical place after responding to a Bluesky put up by Tango himself. Tom has accomplished nice issues which are vital to what we do right here at FanGraphs. He co-wrote The E book: Taking part in The Percentages In Baseball; his title is on the backside of each web page of this web site; and at MLB.com he’s helped to result in an entire new set of instruments which are furthering our data. However on this specific day, I bristled at his dismissiveness of the standard stat, and he appeared shocked by my protection.
“[S]ince it’s so overused on the opposite facet as a *main* degree stat, then so as to “steadiness” issues, then the remainder of us ought to *discard* its utilization,” wrote Tango in a single subsequent put up. Then after railing at it getting used onscreen in a TNT Statcast broadcast, he added within the subsequent, “That is why you need to stamp it out the place we will, as a result of it would nonetheless exist elsewhere anyway.”
As a longtime recurring visitor on MLB Community, I’m sufficiently old to recollect Brian Kenny arguing to “Kill the Win” on MLB Now greater than a decade in the past, and whereas I’m not going to supply a full-throated protection of that exact stat, I perceive the urge to cringe, not solely on the notion that we by some means must cease counting one thing that’s been a part of baseball for over a century, however that we should always achieve this within the title of “educating” the general public. Having spent over 20 years working to encourage the usage of my very own metric (JAWS) and people of my employers by a wider viewers, I’ve discovered — the onerous method — that the impulse to “educate” doesn’t routinely generate a need to soak up these classes, and it particularly doesn’t work in case you’re trying to drag the rug out from beneath the recipient of your message. Looking for to remove acquainted statistics is counterproductive and condescending, and solely makes it harder to get throughout a number of the different work that we do.
What’s humorous in regards to the makes an attempt to maneuver past batting common and the win is that the sport itself is doing a bang-up job of marginalizing each statistics already. We’re simply previous a Corridor of Fame election cycle the place a very good share of the dialogue centered across the rising remoteness of attainable pitching milestones reminiscent of 300 and even 200 wins, as beginning pitcher workloads have been scaled again dramatically over the previous decade. In the meantime, in 2024, the league-wide batting common was simply .243, which is in a digital tie for the fourth-lowest mark since 1900, forward of solely 1968 (.237), 1908 (.239), and 1967 (.242). That digital tie is with the 2022 season, the ultimate yr earlier than MLB banned infield shifts within the service of selling offense. Luis Arraez received the 2024 NL batting title — his third straight batting title, thoughts you — with only a .314 common, the bottom mark for a league chief since 1988 (Tony Gwynn with .313). Arraez had the earlier lowest-since-Gwynn mark as properly, .316 in 2022.
Extra on the numbers under. Concerning the Corridor of Fame election cycle, an excellent better share of the dialogue centered upon the chance that Ichiro Suzuki is likely to be the primary place participant to be elected unanimously. It’s not as a result of he was a better participant than those that preceded him, from Ty Cobb and Babe Ruth on by Willie Mays and Henry Aaron, however as a result of Twenty first-century voters have largely abstained from the gatekeeping to which a grumpy faction of previous voters clung.
Leaving apart the frustration brought on by one individual’s depriving Suzuki of unanimity, I’m virtually as puzzled by some observers’ astonishment that it was Suzuki (or earlier than him, Derek Jeter), and never some slugger of current classic, that just about grew to become the primary place participant to drag off a clear sweep. Regardless of his comparatively modest 107 OPS+ and .402 SLG, it shouldn’t be onerous to understand the enchantment of Suzuki and the opposite hit machines, from Jeter on again to Rod Carew and (leaving the ickiness of his off-field life apart, which admittedly isn’t simple) Pete Rose, and earlier than them, to Sisler, Cobb, and Willie Keeler.
Batting common is leisure worth, in quantity.
It’s imprecise to say the thing of the pitcher-batter confrontation is to get successful. It’s to keep away from making an out — therefore the statheads’ appreciation for OBP — and for a group to take action sufficient occasions in a recreation that it scores extra runs than its opponent. Hits are the most typical method of doing this, about 3 times extra frequent than walks, and so they’re vastly extra entertaining. Pitch recognition, timing, the sound and sight of contact, the trajectory of the ball, the acceleration and pace of the batter and the baserunners, the converging of fielders towards the ball, the suspense of what would possibly transpire if a play is made… a lot is definitely occurring! Significantly with runners on base, a ball in play lights up the sphere like a pinball recreation. It will not be as dramatic as a house run, or as productive, however it’s motion, it’s pleasure — to my thoughts essentially the most accessible type of pleasure the sport has to supply. That model of pleasure is the one most frequently created by the blokes with the excessive batting averages. Ought to it’s a thriller why individuals take pleasure in that, and why they particularly want to have fun the gamers who most regularly make that occur?
After I spoke up on behalf of LeMahieu, Main League Baseball was coming off a high-offense season that featured a document 6,776 residence runs, thanks largely to a extra aerodynamic baseball. The 30 groups hit a mixed .252/.323/.435 whereas scoring 4.83 runs per recreation. Half a decade and a number of other rule modifications later — together with not solely the banning of the shift but in addition the addition of the pitch clock, the disengagement rule, and bigger bases — MLB’s general slashline for 2024 was .243/.312/.399 en path to scoring 4.39 runs per recreation. Residence run ranges weren’t that far off from 2018, earlier than the document excessive, however the league-wide batting common declined 9 factors from the place it was in 2019, a drop representing the lack of 2,216 hits over a 4,858-game season, about 0.9 hits per recreation between the 2 groups. The 2024 mark was eight factors decrease than in 2014, and 19 factors decrease than in 2009, representing the lack of 3,701 hits, about 1.5 hits per recreation between the 2 groups. You may not discover it in case you’re taking in solely a recreation per week, however in case you’re an everyday client, you positively discover. In response to the ever-increasing common pitch velocities which have made contact harder than ever, batters have centered upon getting extra bang for his or her buck, adjusting their pitch choice and swing planes to hit the ball within the air within the hope that it clears the fence and offsets the rise in strikeouts. Broadly talking it has, however that doesn’t imply the sport is healthier for it.
It could be an overstatement to say that baseball is in dire bother provided that the game set income information in 2023 ($11.6 billion) and ’24 ($12.1 billion). However even with back-to-back attendance will increase prior to now two seasons, attendance is down over 10% relative to its 2007 high-water mark. What’s extra, the rise in attendance is about to endure a setback provided that each the A’s and the Rays are briefly transferring to minor league ballparks for 2025. The current World Sequence between the Dodgers and Yankees set a post-pandemic excessive so far as tv scores go, however these scores have been nonetheless decrease than in any World Sequence between 1968 and 2019. The game can’t take its already-marginalized place within the nationwide consciousness with no consideration, which is why it comes as a reduction that the pitch clock has been so profitable, trimming a median of 28 minutes from video games relative to 2022.
There’s no simple treatment to extend the league-wide batting common; if I had one, I is likely to be the following commissioner, however I don’t. Adjusting the peak and distance of the fences, to disincentivize homers whereas creating extra territory for defenders to cowl, is an choice, albeit an costly one as it could require modifications in each ballpark, possible together with a lack of seating. Widening the sphere itself — flaring the foul strains outward by just a few levels — might be too radical for many tastes, significantly in a recreation that loves its proper angles.
Some potential modifications, reminiscent of the rise of the pitching distance, bear no fruit upon experimentation. Others can unleash unintended penalties. We’ve gotten a glimpse at what occurs when the league monkeys with the composition of the ball itself; not solely did modifications in manufacturing supplies and strategies result in balls that have been extra aerodynamic, however the philosophical change introduced by the so-called launch-angle revolution compounded the impression, resulting in the aforementioned swell in homers.
One factor that hasn’t been tried is a return to the time-honored mechanism for restoring steadiness to the sport, tweaking the strike zone’s vertical boundaries. It hasn’t been accomplished since 1996, when the decrease boundary was modified from the highest of the batter’s knees to simply under the kneecap. Tightening the zone might goose offense, although a few of that will be by way of walks, not hits, and one has to wonder if it could exacerbate the already-worrisome traits towards extra hard-throwing relievers and the frequency of pitcher accidents. Final week at Baseball Prospectus, Patrick Dubuque recommended shrinking the scale of gloves as a way of accelerating batting common on balls in play, which feels prefer it is likely to be essentially the most delicate change — one which prices us some internet gems, maybe, however might add a bit extra journey to defensive play, and a sprinkling of additional hits.
Proposing and selecting aside these attainable options might fill a number of columns, and we’ve acquired an extended technique to go till Opening Day. For now I’m content material merely to get this long-simmering rant off my chest. Most of you studying this perceive that batting common isn’t the be-all and end-all of offensive stats; if not, the literature towards that finish, on this web site and others, is voluminous. Understanding that, nevertheless, doesn’t require you to undertake the mindset of your pleasant neighborhood president of baseball operations and demand that our each dialogue of baseball level towards maximizing wins and WAR throughout a roster. Simply let batting common be what it’s at all times been, an simply accessible if generally deceptive thread that runs by a century and a half of baseball historical past, and thru most of our fandom.
