Welcome again to a different version of #AskMyGolfSpy the place readers such as you submit your prime inquiries to our consultants right here at MGS. You may cross alongside your inquiries to the group on Twitter, Fb, Instagram or proper right here within the feedback part under!
For probably the most half, we don’t have any explicit theme to those posts. You ask questions on mainly something, and we reply them. This week is a bit of completely different. With the USGA and R&A saying a plan to rollback the golf ball, we’re focusing fully in your USGA Rollback questions.
Q: Tony, you convey up a superb level concerning the LIV Tour. What guidelines govern their play? USGA and R&A? They’ve their very own rulebook? – Kilted Golfer
A: I get referred to as an fool rather a lot, so that you had me at “you convey up a superb level.” Like different skilled excursions, LIV presently performs underneath the USGA/R&A rulebook however like these different skilled excursions, they’re underneath no obligation to take action.
Given the USGA/R&A’s place as a unifying power, it merely made sense for everybody to play by a single algorithm.
With that individual horse able to bust out of the barn, it’s not out of the realm of risk that LIV (assuming it’s nonetheless round in 2026) would possibly go in one other path, particularly if taking part in by its personal guidelines has the potential to spice up scores.
To throw a bit extra gasoline on the hearth, it’s removed from a provided that the PGA TOUR will undertake the mannequin native rule. We might find yourself with a scenario the place USGA and R&A occasions are the one ones mandating a brand new ball, wherein case it’s doable the governing our bodies might scrap this complete thought and return to the drafting board.
Q: What concerning the LPGA/girls’s sport? – A number of readers
A: The USGA and R&A have indicated they haven’t any plans to implement the mannequin native rule on the U.S. Girls’s Open or Girls’s Open Championship. The pondering is that distance isn’t an issue within the girls’s sport. With that, the likelihood is the LPGA Tour would select to not play underneath the proposed rule.
In the end, that implies that, on the skilled stage, women and men will play by completely different guidelines (because it pertains to the ball).
Q: Now that the proposed standards are out, it will be fascinating to see how far again you must go in know-how to “discover” a historic Tour-level ball that might conform? -Frakk
A: Technically not a query however, as we famous in our story on the rollback announcement, there are balls in the marketplace in the present day that might probably conform to the proposed mannequin native rule. We’re speaking Pinnacle Gentle, Callaway REVA and Supersoft MAX. I’d count on others of comparable spec (Wilson DUO, possibly) would conform as nicely. Spit-balling a bit, however I feel we’re wanting sub-50 compression, maybe a bit decrease.
So far as the how far again we’d should go to discover a ball that might conform to the brand new rule and was really performed on Tour …
Wanting over the information within the 2020 Distance Insights Report, it’s affordable to attribute about 15 yards price of common distance gained to the time between the complete the adoption of the strong core ball and the 2004 implementation of the present ODS (General Distance Normal) used for testing.
The emergence of the strong core ball resulted in massive positive aspects, however successfully, ball distance has been capped since 2004 and, in contrast to the entire COR/CT factor for driver faces, there isn’t actually any grey space. It’s a tough cease.
For what it’s price due to issues like really feel preferences and trajectory and spin wants, it’s not like each ball is on the restrict anyway, although many are shut.
As in your authentic query, you would possibly have the ability to discover an early-generation solid-core ball that might conform to the brand new guidelines (particularly if there’s one thing on the market with notably poor aerodynamics) but it surely’s definitely doable you’d have to return to balata.
Anticipating the follow-up … No, we’re not going again to balata. Whereas we’re instructed there could also be a machine or two nonetheless round, no person has produced a wound ball in fairly a while.
Q: What’s flawed with simply having one ball obtainable for everybody? All producers producing one ball of comparable specs—that might result in gamers solely having a producer to choose from, not a mess of balls from one producer. – Mark
A: What’s flawed with simply having one driver obtainable for everybody? What about one iron specification? How about everyone makes use of the identical wedges (no grind choices) and putter? Whereas we’re at it, why not have everybody put on the identical mannequin (and dimension) of sneakers?
What I’m driving at is that “related” isn’t “identical” and, sooner or later, we now have to acknowledge that launch and trajectory and spin—even with a golf ball—are becoming variables.
As an example the purpose, I pulled information from our 2021 Ball Take a look at. Wanting solely at balls with true Tour-level specs (urethane covers, compression within the mid-80s or increased), there’s 500-rpm distinction between the highest- and lowest-spinning balls (that’s pushing twice what we’d count on to see if we modified driver loft by one diploma).
Utilizing peak peak as our major trajectory metric, it’s a distinction of 20 toes. That will not sound like rather a lot however Tour professionals are infamous for desirous to flight the ball via particular “home windows.” On this case, we’re speaking about home windows two tales aside.
Off irons, the spin delta is roughly 1,100 rpm with 12 toes between our home windows.
My level in all of that is that, identical to mandating a single driver spec or perhaps a single shoe mannequin, you’re finally offering a bonus to the blokes the singular piece of mandated gear, by luck, simply occurs to suit higher.
That’s inherently unfair.
Any time a rule change is being mentioned, one of many issues I take a look at is whether or not the governing our bodies are attempting to mandate what quantities to a becoming variable. Any rule that does must be a non-starter.
Q: I don’t perceive why the golf ball producers are up in arms. They’ve been supplying limited-flight apply balls to ranges for many years. Is it not the identical precept? – Ian W
A: It’s not precisely the identical.
A limited-flight ball doesn’t fly like a Tour ball. Development is basically completely different, as are flight and spin properties. It’s not a simple factor to create a ball that feels, flies and spins like a Tour ball off each membership within the bag however flies 15 to twenty yards shorter.
Q: Would it not not be a lot easier to scale back shaft size? – Ben Tidy
A: There’s been loads of questions round, “Couldn’t they (fill within the clean)?” All the things has been floated from decreasing driver CT, shrinking driver heads and limiting tee peak to faces that collapse at extreme pace (Peter Kostis) and as Ben introduced up, decreasing shaft size.
Whereas a few of these could also be a bit extra farfetched than others, any or all the above would have an effect.
Two issues to contemplate right here.
First, from the preliminary remark interval, I feel the governing our bodies realized fairly rapidly that the results of any try to limit the driving force would probably be sooner/longer fairway woods.
After which what? You then go after these and really rapidly it begins to seem like you’re chasing your tail with no explicit path (extra so than some would say it already does).
The second factor is that each one these proposals are restricted to the driving force.
The golf ball is the one piece of kit you utilize on each shot so whereas we’ve largely talked about distance within the context of the driving force, the proposed rule has the potential to steal distance from each membership within the bag.
Q: Is it REALLY going to make ANY distinction if the professionals drive it 15 yards shorter? Do some extrapolation they usually’ll hit a 7-iron, say, six yards shorter? Typical USGA fool response. Been to any PGA occasions currently? Gone are the Tim Herrons of the Tour. Most of those guys in the present day are athletes! – Mike
A: See above.
The pondering is the rollback will end result within the lack of fifteen or 20 yards (it’s early however the guys on the ball firms I’ve spoken with assume 15 yards is underestimating the loss) off the driving force. Lose extra nonetheless off fairway woods and irons (which is feasible with a brand new ball rule) and now you’re within the ballpark of having the ability to future-proof towards distance positive aspects and maybe play skilled golf in a smaller ballpark.
Q: Would it not realistically be doable for producers to develop a core that “collapses” when being impacted by a specific amount of power? This is able to maintain efficiency as-is for slower guys however for those who hit the pores and skin off it it’s not gonna go as far. – Steven S
A: They have already got. They’re referred to as low-compression or “comfortable” golf balls.
I’m kidding—however solely a bit of. When a low-compression ball is hit at increased pace than it may assist, the core suffers from extreme deformation which leads to decrease pace and fewer distance.
Q: Would the USGA Rollback have an effect on handicap calculations? Two completely different ones?! – Stephane G
A: Good query. I’ll get again to you when the USGA and R&A deal with the difficulty and provide you with a strong workable answer. I feel we’re solidly within the “we’ll determine it out” stage of that individual dialogue.
Q: My essential challenge with the USGA and R&A is that they appear to be largely interested by setting guidelines targeted on the “elite” golfer. They not often spend a lot time and vitality setting guidelines that make golf extra fulfilling for the “leisure“ golfer who symbolize the overwhelming majority of golfers. – Chris C
A: For all of the speak of preservation of the sport, I’m not satisfied it has a lot to do with golfers in any respect. I feel that is all about preservation of the established order because it pertains to championship venues.
I imagine what the governing our bodies are finally interested by is guaranteeing that the professional excursions will all the time have the opportunity to have the ability to compete at what are sometimes thought of the sport’s premier venues similar to St Andrews and Augusta and mainly wherever else they view as golf’s hallowed floor.
You realize … your primary “temples of the sport” nonsense.
Whereas there’s a sensible restrict to distance, I do assume an affordable argument might be made that some programs are vulnerable to not having the ability to assist a play type the governing our bodies deem worthy of their standing. That complete “everyone seems to be hitting driver-wedge on each gap” mythology.
Whether or not or not that’s actual, I really don’t care. This gained’t be a universally well-liked opinion however Augusta has confirmed that it may handle and, ought to the day come the governing our bodies determine {that a} venue like St Andrews can’t match the muscle of the trendy tour professional, that’s high quality.
Once more, I don’t care.
None of that diminishes its standing as one of many world’s nice programs, neither does it imply it’s going to shut its doorways.
Let the professionals play elsewhere. These programs are nonetheless there for the remainder of us.
Q: What would occur if the ball producers refused to adjust to the USGA Rollback? – Robin C
A: I don’t see that taking place. It will take a stage of cooperation (or maybe collusion) that appears unlikely the place being the one man prepared to make a Tour ball—the unofficial official ball—would probably show advantageous.
If all the main manufacturers refused to provide a conforming ball, any individual else would step in.
Q: Are you able to think about completely different occasions having completely different guidelines? That might be a shit present. – Mark (The Golf Addict).
A: The (shit) present hasn’t began but but it surely positive seems like tickets can be obtainable quickly.
Extra Questions?
As all the time, when you have any questions for the MGS crew (they usually don’t should be concerning the golf ball) – drop them under for an opportunity to be featured in subsequent week’s #AskMyGolfSpy!
*We might earn a fee while you purchase via hyperlinks on our website.
