The ODI World Cup 2023 noticed a passionate change of views between former worldwide cricketers Harbhajan Singh and Graeme Smith relating to the Resolution Evaluate System (DRS). The talk was ignited by a contentious DRS name throughout the latest nail-biting encounter between South Africa and Pakistan in Chennai.
On October 27, cricket followers witnessed an exciting contest that finally ended with South Africa securing a slender one-wicket victory over Pakistan. Nonetheless, it was a selected DRS name involving South African bowler Tabraiz Shamsi that turned the focal point.
The incident unfolded throughout the forty sixth over of South Africa’s chase when Pakistani bowler Haris Rauf made a DRS attraction. The decision didn’t favor Rauf, leaving Shamsi to outlive on account of an umpire’s name. Following the sport, Harbhajan took to his social media account to precise his frustration with DRS know-how and its affect on the end result of the match.
“Unhealthy umpiring and unhealthy guidelines value Pakistan this sport… @ICC ought to change this rule… if the ball is hitting the stump, that’s out whether or not the umpire gave out or not out doesn’t matter… in any other case, what’s using know-how???” Harbhajan tweeted.
Unhealthy umpiring and unhealthy guidelines value Pakistan this sport.. @ICC ought to change this rule .. if the ball is hitting the stump that’s out whether or not umpire gave out or not out doesn’t matter.. in any other case what’s using know-how??? @TheRealPCB vs #SouthAfrica #worldcup
— Harbhajan Turbanator (@harbhajan_singh) October 27, 2023
Additionally READ: Twitter reactions – Aiden Markram, Tabraiz Shamsi shine as South Africa pip Pakistan in a thriller – World Cup 2023
Graeme Smith’s response
In response to Harbhajan’s critique, Smith joined the dialog, acknowledging Bhajji’s level. Smith identified that the advantage of doubt may be prolonged to Rassie van der Dussen, who was given out primarily based on a marginal umpire’s name.
“Bhajji, @harbhajan_singh I really feel the identical as you on umpires name, however @Rassie72 and South Africa can have the identical feeling.?,” wrote Smith.
Bhajji, @harbhajan_singh I really feel the identical as you on umpires name, however @Rassie72 and South Africa can have the identical feeling.? https://t.co/lcTvm8zXD1
— Graeme Smith (@GraemeSmith49) October 27, 2023
Harbhajan’s counterargument
Harbhajan promptly responded to Smith’s put up, asserting his view on the matter. He contended that, in his opinion, Van der Dussen was not out, however the know-how was there to provide him out because the umpire had already made the choice. Harbhajan went on to clarify that the know-how saved the umpire from making an incorrect name, moderately than benefiting the participant, who may have probably gained the sport for South Africa.
“He was not out based on me .. however tech was there to provide him out as umpire gave him out.. in any other case umpire would hv seemed unhealthy for incorrect determination.. they saved the umpire there not the participant who may have gained the sport simply for SA,” tweeted Harbhajan.
He was not out based on me .. however tech was there to provide him out as umpire gave him out.. in any other case umpire would hv seemed unhealthy for incorrect determination.. they saved the umpire there not the participant who may have gained the sport simply for SA https://t.co/8aZXAWjaZR pic.twitter.com/FMZCZ5MTY2
— Harbhajan Turbanator (@harbhajan_singh) October 27, 2023
