1
Manchester United’s choice to tug the set off and sack Erik ten Hag was reportedly a joint choice by membership chiefs.
Moments in the past, United formally confirmed that Ten Hag has left his position as membership supervisor. The Dutchman’s closing recreation was Sunday’s 2-1 defeat by the hands of West Ham.
The end result left United in 14th place within the Premier League desk, seven factors above the relegation zone and with a minus-three aim distinction.
Furthermore, United are twenty first of 36 groups within the Europa League desk, having drawn their three opening fixtures.
A membership assertion defined that Ruud van Nistelrooy, who arrived in the summertime in a training capability, has taken over as interim supervisor.
Journalist Ben Jacobs has given extra data on the problem, indicating that the choice was not made by one single particular person.
In line with Jacobs (through X), “Perceive it was a collective and unanimous choice to sack Erik ten Hag.”
“Manchester United needed to present Ten Hag the possibility to work within the new sporting construction, however there’s an acceptance outcomes and performances haven’t been ok prompting a mid-season change.”
“Ruud van Nistelrooy is a short-term appointment whereas the seek for a everlasting head coach continues. Van Nistelrooy has met with, and impressed, Manchester United’s management staff on a number of events.”
“A caretaker position was at all times doubtless if a mid-season change was made.”
Perceive it was a collective and unanimous choice to sack Erik ten Hag.#MUFC needed to present Ten Hag the possibility to work within the new sporting construction, however there’s an acceptance outcomes and performances have not been ok prompting a mid-season change.
Ruud van… pic.twitter.com/IF1JlsvL5g
— Ben Jacobs (@JacobsBen) October 28, 2024
Sam C – a comparatively dependable supply on the subject of United information – reveals, “Perceive that United needed to solely sack Ten Hag after they had a substitute lined up, however in the end sufficient is sufficient.”
“Membership sources confirmed to me that Ruud van Nistelrooy will take cost of the staff within the “quick time period” whereas United make a everlasting appointment.”
Perceive that United needed to solely sack Ten Hag after they had a substitute lined up, however in the end sufficient is sufficient.
Membership sources confirmed to me that Ruud van Nistelrooy will take cost of the staff within the “quick time period” whereas United make a everlasting appointment.
— Sam C (@SamC_reports) October 28, 2024
United return to motion on Wednesday after they face Leicester Metropolis within the Carabao Cup.
